Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial board

This is the editorial board of Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Political affiliation:

Items by this editorial board:

• 'We wrote the bill' (Topic: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: against)
• A pre-9/11 approach to terror (Topic: United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al., Position: Trial should be held in criminal court, Stance: against)
• Affordable Care Act on the ballot (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Amending the First Amendment (Topic: Democracy For All Amendment, Position: Amendment should be ratified, Stance: against)
• Campaign to save Obamacare full of fibs (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Costs? What costs? (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Down on the farm (Topic: 2007 U.S. Farm Bill, Position: Bill should be passed, Stance: against)
• For bankruptcy and socialism (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: against)
• For president: Mitt Romney (Topic: United States presidential election, 2012, Position: Obama should be elected, Stance: against)
• For president: Mitt Romney (Topic: United States presidential election, 2012, Position: Romney should be elected, Stance: for)
• Health care lies (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Here come the Obamacare taxes (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• John Bolton deserves to remain U.N. envoy (Topic: Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006, Position: Bolton should be confirmed, Stance: for)
• John Bolton deserves to remain U.N. envoy (Topic: Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006, Position: Confirmation should be filibustered, Stance: against)
• ObamaCare looms (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Obamacare premiums nowhere near affordable (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• ObamaCare will tighten doctor pools (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Obamacare woes beg for repeal (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Obamacare's broken promises, cancellations only beginning (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• ObamaCare's summer of fall (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• One year later, ObamaCare still in ICU (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Problem-plagued exchange rollout bolsters case against Obamacare (Topic: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Position: Act should not have been passed, Stance: for)
• Review-Journal Endorsement: President of the United States (Topic: 2020 United States presidential election, Position: Biden should be elected, Stance: against)
• Review-Journal Endorsement: President of the United States (Topic: 2020 United States presidential election, Position: Trump should be elected, Stance: for)
• U.S. Senate should set to hear nomination of Neil Gorsuch to Supreme Court (Topic: Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination, Position: Gorsuch should be confirmed, Stance: for)
• Victory for free speech (Topic: McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, Position: Supreme Court voted correctly, Stance: for)
• We can't wait to see how this boondoggle blows up (Topic: American Clean Energy and Security Act, Position: Act should be passed, Stance: against)