First the stimulus, now the hangover by Nicole Gelinas (New York Post, October 12, 2010) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
Stimulus to nowhere by Steve Chapman (Chicago Tribune, September 22, 2010) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
Bam's spending spree by New York Post editorial board (New York Post, August 30, 2010) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
150,000 jobs created? Uh, no by The San Diego Union-Tribune editorial board (The San Diego Union-Tribune, March 3, 2010) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
The Stimulus Evidence One Year On by Robert Barro (The Wall Street Journal, February 23, 2010) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
He's spending your future by Mark Steyn (The Washington Times, August 24, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
FDR’s Sweater Fable by George F. Will (Newsweek, February 28, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
Drowning by Fire Hose by George F. Will (The Washington Post, February 19, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
Road to dependency by The Orange County Register editorial board (The Orange County Register, February 18, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
for |
Imperfect stimulus plan is still the best answer by Mark Zandi (The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 15, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
The Fiscal Stimulus Will Pay For Itself by Ann Pettifor (The Huffington Post, February 15, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
A Fiscal Gamble by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, February 13, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
GOP greets stimulus bill with ‘audacity of nope’ by USA Today editorial board (USA Today, February 12, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
In Defense of Waste by Jonathan Chait (The New Republic, February 12, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Government spending can create jobs by Charles Ballard (The Detroit News, February 12, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Bang for the Bucks by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, February 10, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Roll Over the Republicans by Eugene Robinson (The Washington Post, February 10, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Why I Support the Stimulus by Arlen Specter (The Washington Post, February 9, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Buy American, Buy Depression by Investor's Business Daily editorial board (Investor's Business Daily, February 9, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
5 Points on the Critical State of the Economy by Jeffrey Sachs (The Huffington Post, February 9, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Sell America by Chicago Tribune editorial board (Chicago Tribune, February 8, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
Wanted: Personal Economic Trainers. Apply at Capitol. by Steven Pearlstein (The Washington Post, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
A large stimulus bill for large problems by Scot Lehigh (The Boston Globe, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Disappearing Jobs by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
A whiff of Smoot-Hawley by Rocky Mountain News editorial board (Rocky Mountain News, February 5, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
The Action Americans Need by Barack Obama (The Washington Post, February 5, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
On the Edge by Paul Krugman (The New York Times, February 5, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Getting Tough in Washington by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, February 5, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
The return of economic nationalism by The Economist editorial board (The Economist, February 5, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
Right On Trade by Investor's Business Daily editorial board (Investor's Business Daily, February 4, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
'Buy American' provisions offer recipe for retaliation by USA Today editorial board (USA Today, February 2, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
Once the Stimulus Kicks In, the Real Fight Begins by Robert Reich (The Washington Post, February 1, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Bad politics and urgent remedies by Clive Crook (Financial Times, February 1, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
The US needs its stimulus now by Financial Times editorial board (Financial Times, February 1, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
The US needs its stimulus now by Financial Times editorial board (Financial Times, February 1, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
No protectionism by The San Diego Union-Tribune editorial board (The San Diego Union-Tribune, January 31, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
Herbert Hoover Lives by Frank Rich (The New York Times, January 31, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Obama's lethal game of beggar-thy-neighbour by Rosemary Righter (The Times, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
for |
The Republicans' Fatal Misreading of FDR -- and How It Would Worsen The Depression by Johann Hari (The Huffington Post, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
The Stimulus Advances by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, January 29, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
For real stimulus, fix infrastructure by Star Tribune editorial board (Star Tribune, January 29, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Stimulus bill: On the whole, it makes sense by The Salt Lake Tribune editorial board (The Salt Lake Tribune, January 29, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
Pass the stimulus: Republicans oppose needed aid at their peril by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, January 28, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
The Same Old Song by Bob Herbert (The New York Times, January 26, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
for |
The Fiscal Stimulus, Flawed but Valuable by Christina Romer (The New York Times, October 20, 2012) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
against |
Serious mistake to believe the stimulus failed by Mark Zandi (The Philadelphia Inquirer, July 25, 2010) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
against |
A Bad, Necessary Bill by Michael Gerson (The Washington Post, February 18, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
against |
Obama signs first-step bill by Newsday editorial board (Newsday, February 17, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
against |
Finding a way to salvage America by Mark Udall (The Denver Post, February 17, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
against |
Don't Believe the Stimulus Scaremongers by Amar Bhide (The Wall Street Journal, February 17, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Obama’s new deal is the same old blunder by Dominic Lawson (The Times, February 15, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Exactly How Does Stimulus Work? by Daniel Henninger (The Wall Street Journal, February 15, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
On the dole again by Michael Tanner (New York Post, February 13, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Thirty Years Later, a Return to Stagflation by Paul Ryan (The New York Times, February 13, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Stop the spending sprees by Michael Steele (USA Today, February 12, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
'Historic' Stimulus Is Egregious Waste by Investor's Business Daily editorial board (Investor's Business Daily, February 12, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Wake up and smell the trillions in pork by Michelle Malkin (New York Post, February 12, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Reaganomics vs. Obamanomics by Peter Ferrara (The Wall Street Journal, February 11, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Tax-Cut Stimulus by Investor's Business Daily editorial board (Investor's Business Daily, February 9, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Sorry, O: 'I Won' Won't Cover This by Rich Lowry (New York Post, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
The Fierce Urgency of Pork by Charles Krauthammer (The Washington Post, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Keynes can't help us now by Niall Ferguson (Los Angeles Times, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
The Stimulus Tragedy by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Obama mythology could use some stimulus by Mark Steyn (The Orange County Register, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
What Is Congress Stimulating? by Daniel Henninger (The Wall Street Journal, February 5, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Empty 'stimulus' by Ronald Utt (New York Post, February 4, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
The New Era of Irresponsibility by Jacob Sullum (Reason, February 4, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Unreal Stimulus by Investor's Business Daily editorial board (Investor's Business Daily, February 4, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Real Stimulus Wouldn't Empty Wallets by Pete Sepp (Investor's Business Daily, February 4, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
The Stimulus Package Is More Debt We Don't Need by Tom Coburn (The Wall Street Journal, February 3, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Spend money on U.S. goods by Byron Dorgan (USA Today, February 2, 2009) (view) |
Act's "Buy American" provisions should be removed |
against |
A looming fiasco? by The San Diego Union-Tribune editorial board (The San Diego Union-Tribune, February 2, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Too Little Bang for The Bucks by Robert J. Samuelson (The Washington Post, February 2, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Money for nothing won't grow the economy by Jeff Jacoby (The Boston Globe, February 1, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Politics of payoff by Ben Stein (New York Post, January 31, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Stimulating Times by George F. Will (Newsweek, January 31, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Change for the worse by Charles Hurt (New York Post, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Democratic Stealth Care by Kimberley Strassel (The Wall Street Journal, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
The Right Stimulus by Matthew Continetti (The Weekly Standard, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Look at the Time by Peggy Noonan (The Wall Street Journal, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Bad medicine: Stimulus bill is sickening by New Hampshire Union Leader editorial board (New Hampshire Union Leader, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Stimulated right into being another Europe by Mark Steyn (The Orange County Register, January 30, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
An $800 Billion Mistake by Martin Feldstein (The Washington Post, January 29, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Cleaner and Faster by David Brooks (The New York Times, January 29, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
How About a Payroll Tax Stimulus? by Lawrence Lindsey (The Wall Street Journal, January 29, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
The Entitlement Stimulus by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, January 29, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
A 40-Year Wish List by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, January 28, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
An overoptimistic stimulus plan by Jeff Jacoby (The Boston Globe, January 28, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
$646,214 Per Government Job by Alan Reynolds (The Wall Street Journal, January 28, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Slice the pork from stimulus program by The Detroit News editorial board (The Detroit News, January 28, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
$825B, keep the change by New York Post editorial board (New York Post, January 28, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
When Maynard Met Nancy by Rich Lowry (National Review, January 27, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
'We wrote the bill' by Las Vegas Review-Journal editorial board (Las Vegas Review-Journal, January 25, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
against |
Stimulus aid isn't creating jobs by The Detroit News editorial board (The Detroit News, November 20, 2009) (view) |
Act should not have been passed |
mixed |
Too little in return for stimulus plan by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, February 13, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
mixed |
Stimulus? Yes, some by John Brummett (Las Vegas Review-Journal, February 8, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
mixed |
'Stimulus' Follies: Pelosi's Poison by Kirsten Powers (New York Post, February 6, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
mixed |
The nation needs jobs, not a political agenda by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, February 2, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
mixed |
Jobs, now by The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board (The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 1, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
mixed |
Take Charge by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, February 1, 2009) (view) |
Act should be passed |
mixed |