The Constitution Trumps Arizona

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date July 7, 2010
Quotes-start.png "The Supreme Court has said federal authority can pre-empt state law when the federal interest is dominant and where there already exists a system of federal regulations. The government has done a poor job enforcing its immigration rules, to say the least, but they do exist, and clearly fall under what the Constitution calls “the supreme law of the land.”" Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position Lawsuit was justified on the topic United States of America v. Arizona.