Take Charge

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:18, February 1, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=February 1, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/31/AR2009013101535.h...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date February 1, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/31/AR2009013101535.html
Quote
"The concern: Instead of giving the economy a "targeted, timely and temporary" injection, the plan has been larded with spending on existing social programs or hastily designed new ones, much of it permanent or probably permanent -- and not enough of it likely to create new jobs."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position Act should be passed on the topic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.