A Moment to be Seized in Lebanon

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:21, August 25, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Changed position on further thought, changed URL)


Revision as of 10:33, October 1, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Pruning)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charles Krauthammer
Source The Washington Post
Date 8/18/2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/17/AR2006081701190.html
Quote
"This is no time for the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. to be saying, when asked about the creation of an international force, that "this really is a responsibility of the Secretariat." Maybe officially, but if we are not working frantically behind the scenes to make sure that this preposterously inappropriate body actually gets real troops in quickly, armed with the right equipment and the right mandate, the moment will be lost. And with it, Lebanon."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict / United States should help to disarm Hezbollah on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.


This item argues for the position United Nations should disarm Hezbollah on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=A_Moment_to_be_Seized_in_Lebanon&oldid=2625"