The Iran nuclear deal was necessary – but it comes at a high price: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=The Globe and Mail editorial board, |source=The Globe and Mail |date=July 14, 2015 |url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/editorials/the-iran-nuclear-...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote=In April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel went to Washington and warned that Iran would keep its “vast nuclear infrastructure” if the deal went ahead. Mr. Netanyahu’s objections may have helped stiffen the P5+1’s resolve. Two-thirds of Iran’s centrifuges are to be removed, and its stockpile of low-enriched uranium is to be reduced by more than 95 per cent. | |quote=In April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel went to Washington and warned that Iran would keep its “vast nuclear infrastructure” if the deal went ahead. Mr. Netanyahu’s objections may have helped stiffen the P5+1’s resolve. Two-thirds of Iran’s centrifuges are to be removed, and its stockpile of low-enriched uranium is to be reduced by more than 95 per cent. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of | {{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|Plan is beneficial|for}} |
Latest revision as of 22:19, July 17, 2015
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | The Globe and Mail editorial board |
---|---|
Source | The Globe and Mail |
Date | July 14, 2015 |
URL | http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/editorials/the-iran-nuclear-deal-was-necessary-but-it-comes-at-a-high-price/article25506733/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.