Massachusetts Mess: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board, |source=Investor's Business Daily |date=July 18, 2011 |url=http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/578707/2...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Item | {{Item | ||
|author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board, | |author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board, | ||
|source=Investor's Business Daily | |source=Investor's Business Daily | ||
|date=July 18, 2011 | |date=July 18, 2011 | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should not have been passed|for}} | {{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should not have been passed|for}} | ||
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act must be passed|against}} |
Revision as of 11:45, July 22, 2011
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Investor's Business Daily editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Investor's Business Daily |
Date | July 18, 2011 |
URL | http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/578707/201107181909/Massachusetts-Mess.htm |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
This item argues against the position Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act must be passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.