Massachusetts Mess: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Reverted edits by Pbj (talk) to last revision by Yaron Koren)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Item
{{Item
|author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board,
|author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board,  
|source=Investor's Business Daily
|source=Investor's Business Daily
|date=July 18, 2011
|date=July 18, 2011
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should not have been passed|for}}
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act should not have been passed|for}}
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act must be passed|against}}

Latest revision as of 03:37, July 28, 2011

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Investor's Business Daily editorial board
Source Investor's Business Daily
Date July 18, 2011
URL http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/578707/201107181909/Massachusetts-Mess.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png Add these up and the cumulative cost of RomneyCare is nearly $8.6 billion. The promise of cost-containment has not only been broken, it's been ripped asunder in spectacular fashion. Clearly, what we are seeing in Massachusetts is a sobering preview. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.