In complete union: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Global replace - 'http://washingtontimes.com' to 'http://www3.washingtontimes.com') |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|source=The Washington Times | |source=The Washington Times | ||
|date=March 4, 2007 | |date=March 4, 2007 | ||
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070303-100828-2642r.htm | |url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070303-100828-2642r.htm | ||
|quote="The wonderfully mistitled Employee Free Choice Act would replace the secret union ballot with a system wherein a simple majority of workers can create a union by signing a card in favor. But they would do so in the open, where would-be bosses can see which workers are voting "correctly." The bill also outlaws enticements from management to vote no, which is another big change." | |quote="The wonderfully mistitled Employee Free Choice Act would replace the secret union ballot with a system wherein a simple majority of workers can create a union by signing a card in favor. But they would do so in the open, where would-be bosses can see which workers are voting "correctly." The bill also outlaws enticements from management to vote no, which is another big change." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{opinion|Employee Free Choice Act|Act should be passed|against}} | {{opinion|Employee Free Choice Act|Act should be passed|against}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:27, July 16, 2007
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | The Washington Times editorial board | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | The Washington Times | |||
| Date | March 4, 2007 | |||
| URL | http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070303-100828-2642r.htm | |||
| Quote |
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Employee Free Choice Act.