Eroding detainees rights: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Renamed position) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Global replace - 'http://washingtontimes.com' to 'http://www3.washingtontimes.com') |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|source=The Washington Times | |source=The Washington Times | ||
|date=October 30, 2006 | |date=October 30, 2006 | ||
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20061029-081248-7596r.htm | |url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20061029-081248-7596r.htm | ||
|quote="But now, since the new Military Commissions Act shuts off habeas-corpus petitions in our federal courts by lawyers for detainees on their conditions of confinement -- where coerced interrogations (that could include torture, but we'll never know) are permitted -- Hamdan was right: There is no law for these detainees. " | |quote="But now, since the new Military Commissions Act shuts off habeas-corpus petitions in our federal courts by lawyers for detainees on their conditions of confinement -- where coerced interrogations (that could include torture, but we'll never know) are permitted -- Hamdan was right: There is no law for these detainees. " | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 16:26, July 16, 2007
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Nat Hentoff |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Times |
Date | October 30, 2006 |
URL | http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20061029-081248-7596r.htm |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.
This item argues for the position Act should be overturned on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.