Page values for "Eavesdropping ruling a judicial farce"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
_creationDate | Datetime | August 28, 2006 8:12:51 PM |
_modificationDate | Datetime | October 16, 2006 4:05:33 PM |
_creator | String | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | Searchtext | {{item |author=Robert Novak |source=Chicago Sun-Times |date=August 28, 2006 |url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/08/judicial_chaos.html |quote="Taylor ended up with the case because of forum-shopping: filing multiple lawsuits in quest of a favorable venue. With the executive and ... |
_categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
_numRevisions | Integer | 2 |
_isRedirect | Boolean | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | String | Eavesdropping ruling a judicial farce |
_pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 1,756 |
_lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
_pageID | Integer | 1,756 |
_pageName | Page | Eavesdropping ruling a judicial farce |
_pageTitle | String | Eavesdropping ruling a judicial farce |
_pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | NSA warrantless surveillance controversy | |
Position_fragment | String | Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional | |
Position | Page | NSA warrantless surveillance controversy / Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional | |
Position_link | Wikitext | ||
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Robert Novak |
Source | Page | Chicago Sun-Times |
Date | Date | August 28, 2006 |
URL | URL | http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/08/judicial_chaos.html |
Quote | Text | "Taylor ended up with the case because of forum-shopping: filing multiple lawsuits in quest of a favorable venue. With the executive and legislative branches in Republican hands, liberals count on activists in the federal judiciary such as Taylor. That explains why normally censorious legal scholars tend to excuse her shoddy judicial opinion and ethical trespassing." |
Summary | Wikitext | Eavesdropping ruling a judicial farce by Robert Novak (Chicago Sun-Times, August 28, 2006) (view) |