Build the mosque: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Item |author=The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board |source=The Philadelphia Inquirer |date=August 18, 2010 |url=http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100818_Editorial__B...')
 
m (Text replace - "Cordoba House Mosque" to "Park51 controversy")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="Some of the imam's views - for example, advocating "personal status" courts to decide family law issues according to religious tenets - are not acceptable to most Americans. But a nation whose Constitution promotes religious freedom doesn't have to agree with him to let him preach in Lower Manhattan."
|quote="Some of the imam's views - for example, advocating "personal status" courts to decide family law issues according to religious tenets - are not acceptable to most Americans. But a nation whose Constitution promotes religious freedom doesn't have to agree with him to let him preach in Lower Manhattan."
}}
}}
{{Opinion|Cordoba House Mosque|Mosque should be allowed to be built|for}}
{{Opinion|Park51 controversy|Mosque should be allowed to be built|for}}

Latest revision as of 02:05, August 25, 2010

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board
Source The Philadelphia Inquirer
Date August 18, 2010
URL http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100818_Editorial__Build_the_mosque.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Some of the imam's views - for example, advocating "personal status" courts to decide family law issues according to religious tenets - are not acceptable to most Americans. But a nation whose Constitution promotes religious freedom doesn't have to agree with him to let him preach in Lower Manhattan." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Mosque should be allowed to be built on the topic Park51 controversy.