Affirming the Rule of Law

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:21, June 27, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=New York Post editorial board |source=New York Post |date=June 27, 2008 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/06272008/postopinion/editorials/affirming_the_rule_of_law_117490.htm...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New York Post editorial board
Source New York Post
Date June 27, 2008
URL http://www.nypost.com/seven/06272008/postopinion/editorials/affirming_the_rule_of_law_117490.htm
Quote
"It's a welcome decision - if only in its faithfulness to the uniquely American role of a written Constitution in protecting individual liberties."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic District of Columbia v. Heller.