Congress finally gets on free trade track

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 00:40, November 16, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=San Antonio Express-News editorial board |source=San Antonio Express-News |date=November 14, 2007 |url=http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/editorials/stories/MYSA111507.01O....)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) San Antonio Express-News editorial board
Source San Antonio Express-News
Date November 14, 2007
URL http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/editorials/stories/MYSA111507.01O.peruFTA1ed.19117ac.html
Quote
"As a political issue, free trade often suffers its share of partisan and industry-specific bashing. As an economic issue, no other force is more responsible for raising global prosperity in recent decades than the elimination of protective barriers and the creation of a more efficient system of trade. And few countries have benefited more than the United States."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Agreement should be ratified on the topic Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement.


This item argues for the position Agreement should be ratified on the topic Colombia-United States Free Trade Agreement.


This item argues for the position Agreement should be ratified on the topic U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement.