Seattle Grace

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 10:01, June 29, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Peter Kirsanow |source=National Review |date=June 28, 2007 |url=http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YTQ2M2VjMzEzODdiOWMyMjBkN2UxN2I2MGI3ZTdkM2E= |quote="In contrast, in Sea...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Peter Kirsanow
Source National Review
Date June 28, 2007
URL http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YTQ2M2VjMzEzODdiOWMyMjBkN2UxN2I2MGI3ZTdkM2E=
Quote
"In contrast, in Seattle race was the only individual student characteristic considered; more specifically, the district’s binary notion of race — students were either white or “other.” The district’s peculiar concept of race suggested that it was more interested in having a few brown faces — regardless of race or ethnicity — sprinkled in each classroom than in achieving Grutter-style diversity."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District.