Campaign Finance Success

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 22:29, November 5, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date November 3, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/02/AR2006110201531.html
Quote
"Unlimited soft-money checks were a corrupting influence; they needed to be done away with no matter the impact on the political parties. That soft money could be abolished and the parties remain a vibrant political force is a double benefit."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be repealed on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.