Diplomacy at the U.N.

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:25, September 1, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Sacramento Bee editorial board
Source The Sacramento Bee
Date August 4, 2006
URL http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/story/14287338p-15107044c.html
Quote
"Bush could, as Democrats call for, replace Bolton with someone with a more collegial style. But Bolton is the instrument of a U.S. foreign policy doctrine that sees multilateralism as merely one option, to be used only when it serves U.S. interests. Absent a change in the fundamental U.S. approach to the United Nations, changing ambassadors might make little difference."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position Bolton should be confirmed on the topic Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006.