Obamacare cancellation blues

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:57, November 3, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board, |source=Los Angeles Times |date=November 1, 2013 |url=http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-health-policy-cancella...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source Los Angeles Times
Date November 1, 2013
URL http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-health-policy-cancellations-20131101,0,781858.story#axzz2jNvTO4l6
Quote
The essential benefits and cost limits are meant to prevent people with insurance from being bankrupted by medical bills — a distressingly common occurrence. But they're also part of a larger effort in the law to stop insurers from cherry-picking customers, leaving those who may need expensive treatments unable to find coverage.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.