Fight for the 'public option'

This is an opinion item.

Author(s)	The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board
Source	The Philadelphia Inquirer
Date	August 24, 2009
URL	http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20090824_Editorial__Fight_for_the__public_option_.html
Quote	"A public plan would have real advantages. Because a government-run plan would not be profit-driven, it could offer lower premiums than many private plans. It probably could negotiate lower prices from health-care providers. And it would likely save the government money by providing a low-cost alternative for low-income people seeking to purchase insurance with the help of government subsidies. It would give consumers more choices."

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.