Page values for "We Call That Double-Dipping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | April 6, 2010 9:20:04 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | April 6, 2010 9:20:04 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=April 5, 2010 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/opinion/06tue1.html |quote="The unanswered question is whether — as the critics charge — the change will push a lot of employers into dropping their retire ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | We Call That Double-Dipping |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 6,225 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 6,225 |
| _pageName | Page | We Call That Double-Dipping |
| _pageTitle | String | We Call That Double-Dipping |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | The New York Times editorial board |
| Source | Page | The New York Times |
| Date | Date | April 5, 2010 |
| URL | URL | http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/opinion/06tue1.html |
| Quote | Text | "The unanswered question is whether — as the critics charge — the change will push a lot of employers into dropping their retiree drug plans. The remaining tax subsidy is substantial and many companies and their workers value the retiree drug benefit, so defections may be small. If some retirees do lose their company drug benefits, they can buy government-subsidized coverage in Medicare that may be just or almost as good and will be getting better as health care reform progresses." |
| Summary | Wikitext | We Call That Double-Dipping by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, April 5, 2010) (view) |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act | |
| Position_fragment | String | Act should not have been passed | |
| Position | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should not have been passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |