Page values for "The Supreme Court and the health-care mandate muddle"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeMarch 13, 2011 8:45:54 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeMarch 13, 2011 8:45:54 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=George F. Will, |source=The Washington Post |date=March 13, 2011 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/11/AR2011031105815.html |quote=Judge Kessler disdains the distinction between activity and inactivity as "of little significance." Her Orwellia ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringThe Supreme Court and the health-care mandate muddle
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger7,480
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger7,480
_pageNamePageThe Supreme Court and the health-care mandate muddle
_pageTitleString

The Supreme Court and the health-care mandate muddle

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,George F. Will
SourcePageThe Washington Post
DateDateMarch 13, 2011
URLURLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/11/AR2011031105815.html
QuoteTextJudge Kessler disdains the distinction between activity and inactivity as "of little significance." Her Orwellian theory is that government can regulate the activity - the mental activity - of choosing not to participate in a commercial activity.
SummaryWikitext

The Supreme Court and the health-care mandate muddle by George F. Will (The Washington Post, March 13, 2011) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPagePatient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Position_fragmentStringAct should not have been passed
PositionPagePatient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should not have been passed
Position_linkWikitext

Act should not have been passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor