Page values for "The Abortion Ruling"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeApril 20, 2007 9:37:38 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeApril 20, 2007 9:37:38 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{item |author=The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board |source=The Philadelphia Inquirer |date=April 20, 2007 |url=http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20070420_Editorial___The_Abortion_Ruling.html |quote="Paternalism was slathered all over the majority's words - the idea that women ar ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringThe Abortion Ruling
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger3,345
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger3,345
_pageNamePageThe Abortion Ruling
_pageTitleString

The Abortion Ruling

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board
SourcePageThe Philadelphia Inquirer
DateDateApril 20, 2007
URLURLhttp://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20070420_Editorial___The_Abortion_Ruling.html
QuoteText"Paternalism was slathered all over the majority's words - the idea that women are somehow either ignorant or incompetent to choose for themselves. Kennedy et al. suggest that doctors, knowing the hard decision women face, may sometimes not inform them fully. These are points straight out of the anti-abortion advocates' playbook, sometimes word for word."
SummaryWikitext

The Abortion Ruling by The Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board (The Philadelphia Inquirer, April 20, 2007) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageGonzales v. Carhart
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court was correct in its ruling
PositionPageGonzales v. Carhart / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court was correct in its ruling

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst