Page values for "Reject the 'hate crimes' bill"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | August 10, 2007 6:40:23 AM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | August 10, 2007 6:40:23 AM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{item |author=Peter Sprigg |source=The Washington Times |date=August 10, 2007 |url=http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070810/EDITORIAL/108100014/1013 |quote="Of course, there were differences in the facts and circumstances of the two cases. Nevertheless, to look at them si ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Reject the 'hate crimes' bill |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 3,730 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 3,730 |
| _pageName | Page | Reject the 'hate crimes' bill |
| _pageTitle | String | Reject the 'hate crimes' bill |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007 | |
| Position_fragment | String | Act should be passed | |
| Position | Page | Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007 / Act should be passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Peter Sprigg |
| Source | Page | The Washington Times |
| Date | Date | August 10, 2007 |
| URL | URL | http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070810/EDITORIAL/108100014/1013 |
| Quote | Text | "Of course, there were differences in the facts and circumstances of the two cases. Nevertheless, to look at them side-by-side is to see the inherent inequity in the concept of "hate crimes." Matthew Shepard did not deserve to die. But neither did Cindy Dixon. Yet under "hate crimes" laws, Matthew Shepard would be entitled to greater protection than Cindy Dixon." |
| Summary | Wikitext | Reject the 'hate crimes' bill by Peter Sprigg (The Washington Times, August 10, 2007) (view) |