Page values for "Healthcare at the high court"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | November 17, 2011 2:59:36 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | November 17, 2011 2:59:36 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board, |source=Los Angeles Times |date=November 16, 2011 |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-health-20111116,0,4240404.story |quote=Judge Laurence Silberman (a Reagan appointee) ruled that the individual mandate is constitutional becau ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Healthcare at the high court |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 7,817 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 7,817 |
| _pageName | Page | Healthcare at the high court |
| _pageTitle | String | Healthcare at the high court |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act | |
| Position_fragment | String | Act should not have been passed | |
| Position | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should not have been passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Los Angeles Times editorial board |
| Source | Page | Los Angeles Times |
| Date | Date | November 16, 2011 |
| URL | URL | http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-health-20111116,0,4240404.story |
| Quote | Text | Judge Laurence Silberman (a Reagan appointee) ruled that the individual mandate is constitutional because it regulates the way people pay for their inevitable participation in the market for medical care. In addition, he wrote, the mandate is a critical part of the new rules Congress created for the insurance industry, which are designed to expand coverage and stop insurers from discriminating against people with preexisting conditions. As the Supreme Court has previously decided, Congress can intervene in local, individual decisions when necessary to support a legitimate regulatory regime for interstate commerce. |
| Summary | Wikitext | Healthcare at the high court by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, November 16, 2011) (view) |