Obama’s thin red line: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=New York Post editorial board, |source=New York Post |date=May 4, 2013 |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/obama_thin_red_line_HM6Xwwc7g7xdPYX...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Item | {{Item | ||
|author=New York Post editorial board, | |author=New York Post editorial board, | ||
|source=New York Post | |source=New York Post | ||
|date=May 4, 2013 | |date=May 4, 2013 | ||
|url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/obama_thin_red_line_HM6Xwwc7g7xdPYXpDD67FL | |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/obama_thin_red_line_HM6Xwwc7g7xdPYXpDD67FL | ||
|quote=Never mind that by staying out of this fight for so long, America today has fewer good options. If Obama does not intervene, no one will ever take his threats seriously — least of all the Iranian mullahs seeking a nuclear weapon. They are watching Syria with keen-eyed delight. | |quote=Never mind that by staying out of this fight for so long, America today has fewer good options. If Obama does not intervene, no one will ever take his threats seriously — least of all the Iranian mullahs seeking a nuclear weapon. They are watching Syria with keen-eyed delight. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Syrian civil war|United States should intervene|for}} | {{Opinion|Syrian civil war|United States should intervene|for}} |
Latest revision as of 16:36, May 5, 2013
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | New York Post editorial board |
---|---|
Source | New York Post |
Date | May 4, 2013 |
URL | http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/obama_thin_red_line_HM6Xwwc7g7xdPYXpDD67FL |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.