Can't Be Bothered: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Added new topic)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|Colombia-United States Free Trade Agreement|Agreement should be ratified|for}}
{{opinion|Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement|Agreement should be ratified|for}}
{{opinion|Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement|Agreement should be ratified|for}}

Latest revision as of 10:49, March 11, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date December 5, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR2006120401196.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Some trade bills are so obviously beneficial and unobjectionable that there's no excuse for letting them languish. This is the case with a raft of measures that would extend trade preferences for poor countries -- preferences due to expire at the end of the year." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Agreement should be ratified on the topic Colombia-United States Free Trade Agreement.


This item argues for the position Agreement should be ratified on the topic Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement.