An ObamaCare Board Answerable to No One: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(fitflops sale cheap oakley sunglasses uk ghd ofertas rujp) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Item | |||
|author=David Rivkin, Elizabeth Foley | |||
|source=The Wall Street Journal | |||
|date=June 20, 2013 | |||
|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324634304578539823614996636.html | |||
|quote=Attempts to rein in government spending are laudable, but basic decisions about how and where to cut spending properly belong to Congress. In the 225 years of constitutional history, there has been no government entity that violated the separation-of-powers principle like the Independent Payment Advisory Board does. | |||
}} | |||
{{Opinion|Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act|Act is unconstitutional|for}} | |||
Latest revision as of 14:11, January 30, 2014
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | David Rivkin, Elizabeth Foley |
---|---|
Source | The Wall Street Journal |
Date | June 20, 2013 |
URL | http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324634304578539823614996636.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Act is unconstitutional on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.