Hillary Clinton would make a sober, smart and pragmatic president. Donald Trump would be a catastrophe.

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Los Angeles Times editorial board
Source Los Angeles Times
Date September 23, 2016
URL http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-hillary-endorsement-20160923-snap-story.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png Throughout her public career, beginning with her work in the 1970s for the Children’s Defense Fund, Clinton has advocated for women, children, the poor and minorities. She fought for what came to be known as “Hillarycare” 15 years before “Obamacare” became a thing; she has been outspoken in defense of women’s rights around the globe, including in her powerful and influential speech in Beijing in 1995 proclaiming that “women’s rights are human rights.” Clinton’s long history of advocacy and public service stands in stark contrast to Trump’s record of virtually no leadership at all. He’s famous and wealthy, a TV personality, a showman — but what in his resume suggests he is qualified to lead the country? Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Hillary Clinton should be elected on the topic United States presidential election, 2016.


This item argues against the position Donald Trump should be elected on the topic United States presidential election, 2016.