Written to fail

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:28, July 2, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Rich Lowry |source=New York Post |date=June 30, 2009 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/06302009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/written_to_fail_176795.htm |quote="Perver')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Rich Lowry
Source New York Post
Date June 30, 2009
URL http://www.nypost.com/seven/06302009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/written_to_fail_176795.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Perversities abound. The Los Angeles Times reported that, under the bill, America "would use more carbon-dioxide heavy coal in 2020 than it did in 2005." Time magazine writes that "the total amount of renewable energy generation . . . would actually be less than the renewable energy that would have been produced without the bill." Isn't saving the planet grand?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic American Clean Energy and Security Act.