Page values for "Written to fail"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJuly 2, 2009 1:28:44 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJuly 2, 2009 1:28:44 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Rich Lowry |source=New York Post |date=June 30, 2009 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/06302009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/written_to_fail_176795.htm |quote="Perversities abound. The Los Angeles Times reported that, under the bill, America "would use more carbon-dioxi ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringWritten to fail
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger5,346
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger5,346
_pageNamePageWritten to fail
_pageTitleString

Written to fail

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Rich Lowry
SourcePageNew York Post
DateDateJune 30, 2009
URLURLhttp://www.nypost.com/seven/06302009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/written_to_fail_176795.htm
QuoteText"Perversities abound. The Los Angeles Times reported that, under the bill, America "would use more carbon-dioxide heavy coal in 2020 than it did in 2005." Time magazine writes that "the total amount of renewable energy generation . . . would actually be less than the renewable energy that would have been produced without the bill." Isn't saving the planet grand?"
SummaryWikitext

Written to fail by Rich Lowry (New York Post, June 30, 2009) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act
Position_fragmentStringAct should be passed
PositionPageAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act / Act should be passed
Position_linkWikitext

Act should be passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst