Why John Roberts's wise prudence was the wrong answer on abortion law
Revision as of 15:04, July 20, 2022 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Hugh Hewitt |source=The Washington Post |date=June 25, 2022 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/25/john-roberts-chief-justice-dobbs-overrule-roe-abortion-rights/ |quote=No written, explicit protection for abortion rights exists in the Constitution; nor did the court simply anticipate where state legislatures were headed, as it did in the ''Griswold'' case striking down state barriers to contraception or in ''Obergefell'', which established...")
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Hugh Hewitt |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Post |
Date | June 25, 2022 |
URL | https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/25/john-roberts-chief-justice-dobbs-overrule-roe-abortion-rights/ |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.