Page values for "Why John Roberts's wise prudence was the wrong answer on abortion law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | July 20, 2022 3:04:40 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | July 20, 2022 3:04:40 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Hugh Hewitt |source=The Washington Post |date=June 25, 2022 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/25/john-roberts-chief-justice-dobbs-overrule-roe-abortion-rights/ |quote=No written, explicit protection for abortion rights exists in the Constitution; nor did the court s ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Why John Roberts's wise prudence was the wrong answer on abortion law |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 14,288 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 14,288 |
| _pageName | Page | Why John Roberts's wise prudence was the wrong answer on abortion law |
| _pageTitle | String | Why John Roberts's wise prudence was the wrong answer on abortion law |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization | |
| Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position | Page | Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | for |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Hugh Hewitt |
| Source | Page | The Washington Post |
| Date | Date | June 25, 2022 |
| URL | URL | https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/25/john-roberts-chief-justice-dobbs-overrule-roe-abortion-rights/ |
| Quote | Text | No written, explicit protection for abortion rights exists in the Constitution; nor did the court simply anticipate where state legislatures were headed, as it did in the ''Griswold'' case striking down state barriers to contraception or in ''Obergefell'', which established the right to same-sex marriage. Nothing remotely approaching consensus developed on abortion because of the fierce, continuing debate about the status of the fetus/unborn child. This freighted argument must be settled, if ever, by elected representatives accountable to voters. |
| Summary | Wikitext | Why John Roberts's wise prudence was the wrong answer on abortion law by Hugh Hewitt (The Washington Post, June 25, 2022) (view) |