Why Have Democrats Abandoned Syria?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
LarryGilbert (talk | contribs) (Adding topic/position since they didn't take the first time) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Standardized) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote="History will not kindly judge the Democratic Party foreign policy establishment for turning its back on the plight of the Syrian people. Ever since the revolt against the Assad regime commenced in March, 2011, the abdication of Democratic Party humanitarian DNA toward Syria is Exhibit A for a foreign policy dictated by political expediency rather than determination and resolve." | |quote="History will not kindly judge the Democratic Party foreign policy establishment for turning its back on the plight of the Syrian people. Ever since the revolt against the Assad regime commenced in March, 2011, the abdication of Democratic Party humanitarian DNA toward Syria is Exhibit A for a foreign policy dictated by political expediency rather than determination and resolve." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Syrian civil war| | {{Opinion|Syrian civil war|United States should intervene|for}} |
Latest revision as of 03:35, May 7, 2013
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Marc Ginsberg |
---|---|
Source | The Huffington Post |
Date | August 29, 2012 |
URL | http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amb-marc-ginsberg/why-have-democrats-abando_b_1841000.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.