Why Have Democrats Abandoned Syria?: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Adding topic/position since they didn't take the first time)
(Standardized)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|quote="History will not kindly judge the Democratic Party foreign policy establishment for turning its back on the plight of the Syrian people. Ever since the revolt against the Assad regime commenced in March, 2011, the abdication of Democratic Party humanitarian DNA toward Syria is Exhibit A for a foreign policy dictated by political expediency rather than determination and resolve."
|quote="History will not kindly judge the Democratic Party foreign policy establishment for turning its back on the plight of the Syrian people. Ever since the revolt against the Assad regime commenced in March, 2011, the abdication of Democratic Party humanitarian DNA toward Syria is Exhibit A for a foreign policy dictated by political expediency rather than determination and resolve."
}}
}}
{{Opinion|Syrian civil war|Obama administration must act in support of people of Syria|for}}
{{Opinion|Syrian civil war|United States should intervene|for}}

Latest revision as of 03:35, May 7, 2013

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Marc Ginsberg
Source The Huffington Post
Date August 29, 2012
URL http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amb-marc-ginsberg/why-have-democrats-abando_b_1841000.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "History will not kindly judge the Democratic Party foreign policy establishment for turning its back on the plight of the Syrian people. Ever since the revolt against the Assad regime commenced in March, 2011, the abdication of Democratic Party humanitarian DNA toward Syria is Exhibit A for a foreign policy dictated by political expediency rather than determination and resolve." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.