Page values for "Why Card Check Is Unconstitutional"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeMarch 30, 2009 12:45:09 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeMarch 30, 2009 12:45:09 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee A. Casey |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=March 30, 2009 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123837553079768121.html |quote="Card-check supporters may argue that the activities of labor organizers, no matter how intimidating, involve purely private ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringWhy Card Check Is Unconstitutional
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger5,165
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger5,165
_pageNamePageWhy Card Check Is Unconstitutional
_pageTitleString

Why Card Check Is Unconstitutional

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageEmployee Free Choice Act
Position_fragmentStringAct should be passed
PositionPageEmployee Free Choice Act / Act should be passed
Position_linkWikitext

Act should be passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,David B. Rivkin Jr. Lee A. Casey
SourcePageThe Wall Street Journal
DateDateMarch 30, 2009
URLURLhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123837553079768121.html
QuoteText"Card-check supporters may argue that the activities of labor organizers, no matter how intimidating, involve purely private actions to which the Constitution's protections of free speech and association do not apply. However, the Supreme Court has recognized that certain government-sanctioned regulatory schemes can give associated private conduct the character of state or federal action, making the Constitution applicable."
SummaryWikitext

Why Card Check Is Unconstitutional by David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee A. Casey (The Wall Street Journal, March 30, 2009) (view)