What Voters Want From Their Senator: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Wrong URL)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
|source=The Hartford Courant
|source=The Hartford Courant
|date=8/27/2006
|date=8/27/2006
|url=http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/commentary/hc-commentarylieberman0827.artaug27,0,7114939.story?coll=hc-headlines-commentary
|url=http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/commentary/hc-commentarylamont0827.artaug27,0,1586957.story?coll=hc-headlines-commentary
|quote="Finally and most urgently, we need to change Washington to replace a national security policy of weakness with one of strength. Our costly and counterproductive decision to go to war in Iraq has weakened America - by taking our eye off the ball in Afghanistan, by overstretching our military, by failing to invest in homeland security, by putting Israel's security at risk and by alienating our allies and further angering our adversaries."
|quote="Finally and most urgently, we need to change Washington to replace a national security policy of weakness with one of strength. Our costly and counterproductive decision to go to war in Iraq has weakened America - by taking our eye off the ball in Afghanistan, by overstretching our military, by failing to invest in homeland security, by putting Israel's security at risk and by alienating our allies and further angering our adversaries."
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:44, August 27, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Ned Lamont
Source The Hartford Courant
Date 8/27/2006
URL http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/commentary/hc-commentarylamont0827.artaug27,0,1586957.story?coll=hc-headlines-commentary
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Finally and most urgently, we need to change Washington to replace a national security policy of weakness with one of strength. Our costly and counterproductive decision to go to war in Iraq has weakened America - by taking our eye off the ball in Afghanistan, by overstretching our military, by failing to invest in homeland security, by putting Israel's security at risk and by alienating our allies and further angering our adversaries." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Lieberman should be elected on the topic Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006.


This item argues for the position Lamont should be elected on the topic Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006.