We need more vaccinations, but is Biden OSHA rule the way to get it done?

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Advocate editorial board
Source The Advocate
Date January 12, 2022
URL https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/our_views/article_19f77432-72f6-11ec-9b21-ffe7742f3a32.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png If the court rejects this industry mandate, in a perverse way the Republican-leaning justices will be doing Biden a favor. The mandate would add a burden to corporations large and small, which would presumably have to sideline reluctant workers at a time when they are struggling to find employees. That would further roil a recovering economy by disrupting the supply chain and compounding an inflation problem that leading Democrats, and the Federal Reserve, claimed would be transitory. Transitory is taking a long time to work through the economy. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court should rule in OSHA's favor on the topic National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=We_need_more_vaccinations,_but_is_Biden_OSHA_rule_the_way_to_get_it_done%3F&oldid=33456"