We'll Rue Having Judges on the Battlefield

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:09, June 22, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=Andrew McBride |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=June 21, 2008 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121400406620193453.html |quote="The idea of our judiciary protecting ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Andrew McBride
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date June 21, 2008
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121400406620193453.html
Quote
"The idea of our judiciary protecting the "rights" of the Nazis or the Viet Cong from executive overreaching is every bit as absurd as it sounds. But had Boumediene been decided in 1940, more than 400,000 Axis troops held in more than 500 military facilities in this country during World War II would have had a right to challenge their detention in federal court."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Boumediene v. Bush.