War, law and justice: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Fixed)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{Item
|author=David B. Rivkin Jr.
|author=David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee A. Casey
|source=The Washington Times
|source=The Washington Times
|date=August 24, 2006
|date=August 24, 2006
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060823-085042-1355r.htm
|url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060823-085042-1355r.htm
|quote="Early in her opinion she refers to "the War on Terror of this administration." In other words, this is not her war and it's not America's war, it's George W. Bush's war, and the judge was clearly determined to hold at least one aspect of that war — the NSA surveillance program — unconstitutional. She did so based on a deeply flawed rationale."
|quote="Early in her opinion she refers to "the War on Terror of this administration." In other words, this is not her war and it's not America's war, it's George W. Bush's war, and the judge was clearly determined to hold at least one aspect of that war — the NSA surveillance program — unconstitutional. She did so based on a deeply flawed rationale."
}}
}}
{{additional_author|Lee A. Casey}}
{{Opinion|NSA warrantless surveillance controversy|Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional|against}}
{{opinion|NSA warrantless surveillance controversy|Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional|against}}

Latest revision as of 12:13, March 30, 2009

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) David B. Rivkin Jr., Lee A. Casey
Source The Washington Times
Date August 24, 2006
URL http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060823-085042-1355r.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Early in her opinion she refers to "the War on Terror of this administration." In other words, this is not her war and it's not America's war, it's George W. Bush's war, and the judge was clearly determined to hold at least one aspect of that war — the NSA surveillance program — unconstitutional. She did so based on a deeply flawed rationale." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional on the topic NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.