Page values for "Voting Rights Watershed"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeMarch 5, 2013 4:59:39 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeMarch 5, 2013 4:59:39 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=The Wall Street Journal editorial board, |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=February 28, 2013 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323549204578318092984575334.html |quote=The Constitution says the federal government must treat all states equally under the law. This i ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringVoting Rights Watershed
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger8,417
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger8,417
_pageNamePageVoting Rights Watershed
_pageTitleString

Voting Rights Watershed

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,The Wall Street Journal editorial board
SourcePageThe Wall Street Journal
DateDateFebruary 28, 2013
URLURLhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323549204578318092984575334.html
QuoteTextThe Constitution says the federal government must treat all states equally under the law. This is called the "equal footing" doctrine, and exceptions require extraordinary circumstances to pass legal muster. Such circumstances certainly prevailed in 1965 when Congress passed the Voting Rights Act to overturn local and state laws that denied blacks their right to vote.
SummaryWikitext

Voting Rights Watershed by The Wall Street Journal editorial board (The Wall Street Journal, February 28, 2013) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageShelby County v. Holder
Position_fragmentStringSupreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act
PositionPageShelby County v. Holder / Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act
Position_linkWikitext

Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor