https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Voting_Rights_Act_isn%27t_obsolete&feed=atom&action=historyVoting Rights Act isn't obsolete - Revision history2024-03-29T14:34:21ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.2https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=Voting_Rights_Act_isn%27t_obsolete&diff=16403&oldid=prevYaron Koren: Created page with "{{Item |author=The Baltimore Sun editorial board, |source=The Baltimore Sun |date=February 26, 2013 |url=http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-02-26/news/bs-ed-voting-2013022..."2013-03-05T16:19:12Z<p>Created page with "{{Item |author=The Baltimore Sun editorial board, |source=The Baltimore Sun |date=February 26, 2013 |url=http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-02-26/news/bs-ed-voting-2013022..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Item<br />
|author=The Baltimore Sun editorial board, <br />
|source=The Baltimore Sun<br />
|date=February 26, 2013<br />
|url=http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-02-26/news/bs-ed-voting-20130226_1_photo-id-laws-minorities-voter-suppression<br />
|quote=Indeed, the Justice Department has used Section 5 thousands of times over the years to reject changes to voting law that would discriminate against minorities. Photo ID laws are just the latest example. There have been efforts to rewrite district lines, registration procedures and other rules that would have had the practical effect of reducing minority participation. Shouldn't this be an easy call for a Supreme Court? It certainly has been for lower courts, and it would require a truly activist judge to overturn a measure that had such a long history and such overwhelming support by Congress<br />
}}<br />
{{Opinion|Shelby County v. Holder|Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act|against}}</div>Yaron Koren