Page values for "Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
_creationDate | Datetime | March 5, 2013 4:19:12 PM |
_modificationDate | Datetime | March 5, 2013 4:19:12 PM |
_creator | String | Yaron Koren |
_fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=The Baltimore Sun editorial board, |source=The Baltimore Sun |date=February 26, 2013 |url=http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-02-26/news/bs-ed-voting-20130226_1_photo-id-laws-minorities-voter-suppression |quote=Indeed, the Justice Department has used Section 5 thousands of times ov ... |
_categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
_numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
_isRedirect | Boolean | No |
_pageNameOrRedirect | String | Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete |
_pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 8,415 |
_lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
_pageID | Integer | 8,415 |
_pageName | Page | Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete |
_pageTitle | String | Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete |
_pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Topic | Page | Shelby County v. Holder | |
Position_fragment | String | Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act | |
Position | Page | Shelby County v. Holder / Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act | |
Position_link | Wikitext | Supreme Court should strike down section 5 of the Voting Rights Act | |
Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this pageField | Field type | Value |
---|---|---|
Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | The Baltimore Sun editorial board |
Source | Page | The Baltimore Sun |
Date | Date | February 26, 2013 |
URL | URL | http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-02-26/news/bs-ed-voting-20130226_1_photo-id-laws-minorities-voter-suppression |
Quote | Text | Indeed, the Justice Department has used Section 5 thousands of times over the years to reject changes to voting law that would discriminate against minorities. Photo ID laws are just the latest example. There have been efforts to rewrite district lines, registration procedures and other rules that would have had the practical effect of reducing minority participation. Shouldn't this be an easy call for a Supreme Court? It certainly has been for lower courts, and it would require a truly activist judge to overturn a measure that had such a long history and such overwhelming support by Congress |
Summary | Wikitext | Voting Rights Act isn't obsolete by The Baltimore Sun editorial board (The Baltimore Sun, February 26, 2013) (view) |