Volatile Syria: There are more reasons for the U.S. to stay out

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:21, May 7, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board, |source=Pittsburgh Post-Gazette |date=May 7, 2013 |url=http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/editorials/volatile...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board
Source Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Date May 7, 2013
URL http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/editorials/volatile-syria-there-are-more-reasons-for-the-us-to-stay-out-686548/
Quote
Quotes-start.png U.S. efforts need to be directed strongly to moving the combatants to the negotiating table as soon as possible before matters get worse. The Israeli air attacks and the rebels using sarin gas are clear messages to all interested parties, including Iran, Qatar, Russia and Saudi Arabia, that enough is now more than enough. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should intervene on the topic Syrian civil war.