Time's Up

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:47, May 20, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (NATO is never mentioned, but it's implied (I think))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date May 20, 2007
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/19/AR2007051900643.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "In his April 18 speech Mr. Bush mentioned one clear remedy for such attacks: steps "by the international community" to "deny Sudan's government the ability to fly its military aircraft over Darfur." There is support for that idea in the British government; now is the time for Mr. Bush to actively explore it while implementing the unilateral U.S. financial sanctions he outlined." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position NATO should intervene on the topic Darfur conflict.


This item argues for the position Economic sanctions should be imposed on Sudan on the topic Darfur conflict.