Three Bad Rulings

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:17, June 26, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=June 26, 2007 |url= |quote="The decision contained a...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The New York Times editorial board
Source The New York Times
Date June 26, 2007
Quotes-start.png "The decision contained a lot of pious language about protecting free speech. But magnifying the voice of wealthy corporations and unions over the voice of candidates and private citizens is hardly a free speech victory." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Supreme Court was right to strike down "Wellstone Amendment" on the topic Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.