Page values for "The scariest defense for ObamaCare"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeMarch 7, 2011 4:50:46 AM
_modificationDateDatetimeMarch 7, 2011 4:50:46 AM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Rich Lowry, |source=New York Post |date=March 5, 2011 |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_scariest_defense_for_obamacare_oFzcrypCeVBhBsyZttOBDK |quote=The fundamental question in the ObamaCare case is whether there is any constraint on the ability of Congress ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringThe scariest defense for ObamaCare
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger7,437
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger7,437
_pageNamePageThe scariest defense for ObamaCare
_pageTitleString

The scariest defense for ObamaCare

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Rich Lowry
SourcePageNew York Post
DateDateMarch 5, 2011
URLURLhttp://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_scariest_defense_for_obamacare_oFzcrypCeVBhBsyZttOBDK
QuoteTextThe fundamental question in the ObamaCare case is whether there is any constraint on the ability of Congress to regulate economic activity. Do we still live in a system of dual sovereignty, split between the federal government and the states, as set out by the Constitution? Does the federal government only have certain enumerated powers? Is anything beyond its ambit? Judge Kessler's argument is a ringing "no" on all three counts.
SummaryWikitext

The scariest defense for ObamaCare by Rich Lowry (New York Post, March 5, 2011) (view)