The hypocrisy of 'US v. Arizona'

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 20:15, July 7, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=Rich Lowry |source=New York Post |date=July 7, 2010 |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_hypocrisy_of_us_arizona_sc6zDn8pg7qAWMMGU69DhI |qu...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Rich Lowry
Source New York Post
Date July 7, 2010
URL http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_hypocrisy_of_us_arizona_sc6zDn8pg7qAWMMGU69DhI
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Arizona has been here before. Pro-immigration groups sued over its workplace-enforcement law passed in 2007. All the same arguments were mustered about federal pre-emption. The federal courts rejected them because the state law so closely tracked the federal law and didn't contradict its stated purpose." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Lawsuit was justified on the topic United States of America v. Arizona.