Page values for "The hypocrisy of 'US v. Arizona'"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJuly 7, 2010 8:15:44 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJuly 7, 2010 8:15:44 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Rich Lowry |source=New York Post |date=July 7, 2010 |url=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_hypocrisy_of_us_arizona_sc6zDn8pg7qAWMMGU69DhI |quote="Arizona has been here before. Pro-immigration groups sued over its workplace-enforcement law passed in 2007. ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringThe hypocrisy of 'US v. Arizona'
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger6,594
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger6,594
_pageNamePageThe hypocrisy of 'US v. Arizona'
_pageTitleString

The hypocrisy of 'US v. Arizona'

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Rich Lowry
SourcePageNew York Post
DateDateJuly 7, 2010
URLURLhttp://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_hypocrisy_of_us_arizona_sc6zDn8pg7qAWMMGU69DhI
QuoteText"Arizona has been here before. Pro-immigration groups sued over its workplace-enforcement law passed in 2007. All the same arguments were mustered about federal pre-emption. The federal courts rejected them because the state law so closely tracked the federal law and didn't contradict its stated purpose."
SummaryWikitext

The hypocrisy of 'US v. Arizona' by Rich Lowry (New York Post, July 7, 2010) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageUnited States of America v. Arizona
Position_fragmentStringLawsuit was justified
PositionPageUnited States of America v. Arizona / Lawsuit was justified
Position_linkWikitext

Lawsuit was justified

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstagainst