Page values for "The future of Keystone XL"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | February 25, 2015 10:01:43 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | February 25, 2015 10:01:43 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Los Angeles Times editorial board, |source=Los Angeles Times |date=February 2, 2014 |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/02/opinion/la-ed-keystone-pipeline-20140202 |quote=Obama should place heavy emphasis on what EPA scientists are telling him; these are the nation's top experts ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 1 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | The future of Keystone XL |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 13,158 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 13,158 |
| _pageName | Page | The future of Keystone XL |
| _pageTitle | String | The future of Keystone XL |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Keystone XL pipeline | |
| Position_fragment | String | Pipeline should be built | |
| Position | Page | Keystone XL pipeline / Pipeline should be built | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Los Angeles Times editorial board |
| Source | Page | Los Angeles Times |
| Date | Date | February 2, 2014 |
| URL | URL | http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/02/opinion/la-ed-keystone-pipeline-20140202 |
| Quote | Text | Obama should place heavy emphasis on what EPA scientists are telling him; these are the nation's top experts on the environment. And even if the Canadian tar sands extraction would not be, by itself, a devastating new source of greenhouse gases, the Keystone XL would be a sorry symbol of the world's continued reliance on fossil fuels. |
| Summary | Wikitext | The future of Keystone XL by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, February 2, 2014) (view) |