The fallout from an attack on Iran would be devastating

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:08, October 5, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Seumas Milne |source=The Guardian |date=October 5, 2007 |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2184077,00.html |quote="Iran has the reach to deliver an unconvention...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Seumas Milne
Source The Guardian
Date October 5, 2007
URL http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2184077,00.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Iran has the reach to deliver an unconventional armed response in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf - as well as on the streets of London. The economic impact could be even greater, given Iran's grip on the 20% of global oil supplies that are shipped through the Strait of Hormuz. It would also certainly set back the cause of progressive change in Iran." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.